您好，欢迎访问重庆市农业科学院 机构知识库！

Effects of Water-Saving Irrigation on Direct-Seeding Rice Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in North China

文献类型： 外文期刊

作者： Hang, Xiaoning 1 ; Danso, Frederick 3 ; Luo, Jia 1 ; Liao, Dunxiu 1 ; Zhang, Jian 1 ; Zhang, Jun 3 ;

作者机构： 1.Chongqing Acad Agr Sci, Chongqing 401329, Peoples R China

2.Agr & Rural Subctr Chongqing Ecol Environm Monito, Chongqing 401329, Peoples R China

3.Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Crop Sci, Key Lab Crop Physiol & Ecol, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China

关键词： rice production; CH4; N2O; water productivity; global warming

期刊名称：AGRICULTURE-BASEL （ 影响因子：3.3； 五年影响因子：3.5 ）

ISSN：

年卷期： 2022 年 12 卷 7 期

页码：

收录情况： SCI

摘要： Rice cultivation consumes more than half of the planet's 70% freshwater supply used in agricultural production. Competing water uses and climate change globally are putting more pressure on the limited water resources. Therefore, water-saving irrigation (WSI) is recommended for rice production in water scares areas. The impact of WSI techniques on direct-seeding rice production and greenhouse gas emissions in North China is becoming increasingly important in the era of climate change. Therefore, we conducted a two-year field experiment on directly seeded rice to assess the impact of traditional flooding irrigation (CK) and three water saving irrigation (WSI) methods, including drip irrigation with an irrigation amount of 50 mm (DI1) and 35 mm (DI2) at each watering time and furrow wetting irrigation (FWI), on rice yield and greenhouse emissions. Generally, the WSI techniques decreased the number of rice panicles per m(-2), spikelet per panicle, 1000-grain weight and rice yield compared to CK. Rice yield and yield components of (DI1) were significantly higher than (DI2). The adoption of either (DI1) or (FWI) showed insignificant variation in terms of rice yield and its yield components measured except for 1000-grain weight. The water productivity was 88.9, 16.4 and 11.4% higher in the FWI plot than the CK, DI1 and DI2 plots, respectively. The WSI decreased cumulative CH4 emission significantly by 73.0, 84.7 and 64.4% in DI1, DI2 and FWI, respectively, in comparison with CK. The usage of DI2 triggered 1.4 and 2.0-fold more cumulative N2O emission compared to DI1 and FWI, respectively. Area-scaled emission among the water-saving irrigation methods showed no significance. The yield-scaled emission in DI1 and DI2 and FWI were 101, 67.5 and 102%, respectively, significantly lower than CK. The adoption of FWI produced an acceptable rice yield with the lowest yield-scaled emission and highest water productivity among the irrigation practices. Our experiment demonstrates that dry direct-seeding with furrow irrigation can impact triple-wins of sustainable rice yield, high water-use efficiency and low GHG emissions in North China.

  • 相关文献

[1]Effects of Water-Saving Irrigation on Direct-Seeding Rice Yield and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in North China. Hang, Xiaoning,Luo, Jia,Liao, Dunxiu,Zhang, Jian,Hang, Xiaoning,Liao, Dunxiu,Zhang, Jian,Danso, Frederick,Zhang, Jun. 2022

作者其他论文 更多>>
置顶
购物车
反馈

© 京ICP备09089781号-29 主办单位：重庆市农业科学院

学术资源： 中国农业科学院 农业专业知识服务系统 农科联盟资源共建共享平台 中国农业科技文献与信息服务平台 中国农业期刊集成服务平台